From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:39:04 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: x86, boot: use .code16gcc instead of .code16
X-Git-Tag: archive/raspbian/4.9.13-1+rpi1~10^2~22076^2~13
X-Git-Url: https://dgit.raspbian.org/%22http:/www.example.com/cgi/%22https:/%22bookmarks:///%22http:/www.example.com/cgi/%22https:/%22bookmarks:/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=28b48688;p=linux-4.9.git

x86, boot: use .code16gcc instead of .code16

Use .code16gcc to compile arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S rather than
.code16, since some older versions of binutils can't generate 32-bit
addressing expressions (67 prefixes) in .code16 mode, only in
.code16gcc mode.

Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
---

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
index 507793739ea5..1dfbf64e52a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  * touching registers they shouldn't be.
  */
 
-	.code16
+	.code16gcc
 	.text
 	.globl	intcall
 	.type	intcall, @function